Skip to main content

AI:Utopia or Dystopia?

*This was an in-class essay for my English Debate class in 2017

In the democracy of ancient Athena, women and slaves did all the work leaving the men free to practice politics, study history, and create art. It may be possible to recreate such a utopia in the world we live in now with the help of AI. People dream of a world where machines do all the work while people can focus on creative projects. However, if AI progresses in the direction it is currently going in, the world will turn into a dystopia.
People worry the most about the effect AI will have on jobs. It is natural for jobs to appear and disappear. The cycle has gone on for centuries, as jobs go out of fashion and new jobs are created to fill their place. The problem occurs when a massive amount of jobs disappears but there are not enough to replace them. The World Economic Forum predicted a net loss of over 5 million jobs in 15 developed countries by 2020. People working in factories, transportation, retail and many more are being replaced by machines. Experts predict that jobs people thought needed a human’s touch, like doctors, teachers, and judges, will become more and more automated. Only jobs that require creative thinking and innovation thoughts will remain, and with the development of AI, we don’t know how long those will last. The creative jobs aren’t enough to hire the increasing number of jobless people, and it is hard for people to do well without a level of knowledge or skill. Machines and AI overpower the human ability in speed, quality, cost-efficiency and accuracy, leaving no jobs and opportunities for humans.
Of course, it would be ideal if the profit earned by using AI allows people to live happily without working, but this is impossible if the power stays focused. The small number of rich leaders who own AI benefit from it. As Putin said, “whoever owns the sphere (AI) rules to world.” AI is so powerful that no one will be able to compete against a group or person that owns it. The majority will have to rely on the owners, creating a world similar to a communist society. This might be okay, better even for a few years if virtuous people hold the power but as history shows us, it will eventually turn into a dictatorship. Only this time, the dictator rules not only a country but the whole world. The technology and resources used to develop AI are focused in only a few wealthy nations. The developing countries will never be able to stand on their own, always relying on developed countries for resources. Global domination, which only appeared in fictions and conspiracies, might become a reality with AI.
Although there are many benefits that come with the development of technology, the side effects are too big to ignore. A recent issue is the invasion of privacy. People, especially women have to fear getting filmed even in one’s own house. There were many cases of hacking, from ransomware to major businesses. These phenomenons will only become more frequent and worse as AI develops. We also have to worry about what the future holds. Weapons developed with AI will be much more deadly, cruel, and efficient. Many experts say that AI weapons will be much more dangerous and will have a bigger impact than nuclear weapons. We can’t blindly develop AI without considering the massive negative impact it will bring.
I’m not saying we should all become neo-luddites. The development of technology is a positive progress. However, if we aren’t careful, the world will turn into a dystopia where the minority rules the world, the majority don’t have jobs, and people have to live in fear. We can’t continue on the current path, allowing this to happen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Frankenstein reimagined

*This was written as a creative writing assignment on June 18, 2018 for Ms. Seuk's British literature class. While attempting to imitate Mary Shelley's voice as closely as possible, I wrote what would have happened if Frankenstein actually created the mate for his monster instead of destroying it. I sat at my desk, blindly staring at the violent storm ripping at the windows. The thunder was roaring and the wind was howling as if to chastise me. Rain pelted the windows, ready to break in. A crack of lightening illuminated the room, only to be followed by impenetrable darkness seconds later. The lightening brought back memories I was trying to avoid. The lightening was not unlike the one that struck earlier in the night. With that crack of lightening, another filthy fiend opened its eyes. As promised, the monster took its female away out of my sight. It was now over. The monster and its partner were going to go far away, unable to harm anyone anymore. But disgust and agony s...

Ongoing tale: My Heart is Broken

Mavis Gallant's My Heart is Broken follows the conversation between Jeannie and Mrs. Thompson regarding Jeannie's rape. Sadly, but not surprisingly, the aftermath of rape has not changed much since 1964. Mrs. Thompson implies that Jeannie is also responsible for the rape occurring. With words like "If you'd listened to me, none of this would have happened" or "I told you it would make trouble, all that being cute and dancing around" Mrs. Thompson blames Jeannie for what happened. The rapist is nonexistent in this conversation, Mrs. Thompson refusing to find out who he is. Jeannie is considered the main reason of the rape as Mrs. Thompson believes it could have been prevented if Jeannie acted differently. Mr. Sherman goes even further, arguing "no man by his own self can rape a girl, so there was either two men or else she's invented the whole story". This leads to a social atmosphere at the camp prevents Jeannie and her husband Vern fro...

Incentives for grades

*This essay was an in-class essay written in my English Debate class in 2017 When I hear of students getting incentives for grades, I think of a guy I knew in in middle school. He used to get good grades but mixed with the wrong crowd, causing his scores to plummet. His parents were desperate and offered to buy him cigarettes and alcohol for him if he raised his grades. Of course, this is an extreme case that would even shock students who receive incentives. But thinking of this case, plus the many drawbacks of incentives for grades makes me grateful that I didn’t receive incentives while growing up. Giving incentives to students has short term benefits but also has long term side effects. Incentives can make students study harder, but they condition the students so they can’t study without them. I had many friends growing up. Many of them actually raised their scores because their parents promised them a new phone, concert tickets, and so on. However, the problems occurred af...